What’s Missing From This Photo of Politicians Deciding the Future of Women’s Health?

What’s Missing From This Photo of Politicians Deciding the Future of Women’s Health?

Go ahead … guess.

Nevermind, I’ll just say it. Sausagefest!

11 Responses to What’s Missing From This Photo of Politicians Deciding the Future of Women’s Health?

  1. Accremonious says:

    This photo contains only one woman, plus most of the men are in various stages of baldness! This indicates a definite skew in the make up of this political gathering! Plus there is only one that I can see who uses a toupee! [the blond bugger beside the American Flag!]

    • Perhaps women need to stop sleeping with men like this.

      All women of America, repeat after me: “If my body isn’t worthy of health care to you, you don’t get to touch it!”

  2. ECA says:

    I would LOVE for all the WIVES of these men, to SIT NEXT TO THEM…and listen to this CRAP..

    • I would love it if they told them to fuck off and die and divorced them for disrespecting their bodies.

      See if these men still feel this way after a few years of humping their own fists.

  3. ECA says:

    ps…..
    HOW many FEMALE medical DOCTORS are in this room??
    Might as well get a Bunch of dogs debating CATS in this room..

    • Presumably 0. How many male medical doctors in the room may also be zero, especially if you believe as I do, that science deniers should lose their medical licenses. All of modern medical science is founded on evolution. If someone denies biological evolution, they should instantly lose their medical license, IMNSHO.

      Ditto for pharmacists who refuse to fill all valid prescriptions.

  4. ECA says:

    For all the fun of the past, Where Women and MEN, help heal people…THEN for some reason the IDEA that MEN ONLY could do Anything…(had to be a POPE that hated women) we went to Idiocy..and MAN controlled LEARNING..(god help us) Which took them YEARS…and YEARS…and STILL it took them till the Middle of the 1900’s to EVEN consider Women were abit different..

    • Interesting, but …

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_royal_candidate_theory

      Critics of the theory point out that perhaps a third of all Americans may be descended from King John, and that the odds of being distantly related to other royalty are even higher. This is an effect of a phenomenon known as pedigree collapse, which occurs due to the doubling of the number of a person’s ancestors with each generation. In theory, each person has over one thousand ancestors after ten generations, and one million after twenty, far exceeding the number of persons actually living in most regions at any point in time. In fact, most people are descended from the same ancestors multiple times through different lines, while anyone living at the time of King John could have tens of millions of descendants in the present day.

  5. ECA says:

    And we have only had 9 generations(based on age 20).. 5 generations of presidents..as each has been around 60+..

Leave a comment