<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Explanation of Dark Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/</link>
	<description>The blog of a bipolar misanthrope</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Misanthropic Scott</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>Misanthropic Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2422</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a big fan of Lovelock. I do agree with a lot of what he&#039;s saying about population. I&#039;m not sure about the idea of charcoal. I haven&#039;t heard enough about it. And, I don&#039;t support nuclear fission on earth in any way shape manner or form. Fusion would be a different matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of Lovelock. I do agree with a lot of what he&#8217;s saying about population. I&#8217;m not sure about the idea of charcoal. I haven&#8217;t heard enough about it. And, I don&#8217;t support nuclear fission on earth in any way shape manner or form. Fusion would be a different matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>Well then, to make up for that, here&#039;s an article that agrees right along with several of your positions.  &quot;You are not alone!&quot; 

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, to make up for that, here&#8217;s an article that agrees right along with several of your positions.  &#8220;You are not alone!&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misanthropic Scott</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>Misanthropic Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>bobbo,

Sorry, this one is a bit beyond me. I wonder if it might have anything to do with the fact that at light speed, time stops. So, one might say, though KD has disputed this and knows more, that from the point of view of the photon, if it had one, the photon is everywhere along its trajectory simultaneously.

I&#039;m probably just blowing this out my ass; it likely has nothing to do with this. The idea that a photon has no position is strange to me since they are detected when they physically hit things. But then, anyone who thinks they understand quantum mechanics is wrong. It quite literally defies logic in nearly every possible way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bobbo,</p>
<p>Sorry, this one is a bit beyond me. I wonder if it might have anything to do with the fact that at light speed, time stops. So, one might say, though KD has disputed this and knows more, that from the point of view of the photon, if it had one, the photon is everywhere along its trajectory simultaneously.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably just blowing this out my ass; it likely has nothing to do with this. The idea that a photon has no position is strange to me since they are detected when they physically hit things. But then, anyone who thinks they understand quantum mechanics is wrong. It quite literally defies logic in nearly every possible way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2419</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2419</guid>
		<description>Scott--thought of you when reading this article.  It goes more to the nature of the photon rather than size.  Could you read this and explain it to the rest of us? (smile)  

http://arstechnica.com/science/2009/03/why-photons-are-always-neither-here-nor-there.ars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8211;thought of you when reading this article.  It goes more to the nature of the photon rather than size.  Could you read this and explain it to the rest of us? (smile)  </p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2009/03/why-photons-are-always-neither-here-nor-there.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/science/2009/03/why-photons-are-always-neither-here-nor-there.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misanthropic Scott</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Misanthropic Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>bobbo,

I&#039;ll have to google too now since I&#039;m no longer sure of the accuracy of the 10^22. I think I heard it at a lecture by Neil de Grasse Tyson. I could be mistaken or could have mixed up numbers.

Interesting link.

WRT blood in the stool, yecch, I had heard that it would make the stool black. Red streaks would be more likely from hemorrhoids. Are you two suggesting that god has polyps and roids? And I thought I was the heretic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bobbo,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to google too now since I&#8217;m no longer sure of the accuracy of the 10^22. I think I heard it at a lecture by Neil de Grasse Tyson. I could be mistaken or could have mixed up numbers.</p>
<p>Interesting link.</p>
<p>WRT blood in the stool, yecch, I had heard that it would make the stool black. Red streaks would be more likely from hemorrhoids. Are you two suggesting that god has polyps and roids? And I thought I was the heretic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>Scott--you always do such excellent work with links and what not, I wanted to give you a good one for the number of stars/sand.  So I googled &quot;number of stars in the universe&quot; and just the first two entries vary the estimate by an order 10 exponents.

10x13th would be between your two numbers but 10x22nd would match the number of planets==not probable unless your stat is only one of a batch of wildly variable estimates?

&quot;number of grains of sand&quot; was kinda interesting to read about here:  http://visindavefur.hi.is/svar.asp?id=4803 estimating the number at
6.63 × 10x22

On the way, I noticed a website calculating the how many grains of sand it would take to fill the universe.  Just checked, the number was with reference to Archimedes.  Bright as he was, I don&#039;t think he had a clue?

Fusion--damn you.  Now I have to take some extra minutes to stare at my shit.  Any different shade of red from polyps vs hemorrhoids?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8211;you always do such excellent work with links and what not, I wanted to give you a good one for the number of stars/sand.  So I googled &#8220;number of stars in the universe&#8221; and just the first two entries vary the estimate by an order 10 exponents.</p>
<p>10&#215;13th would be between your two numbers but 10&#215;22nd would match the number of planets==not probable unless your stat is only one of a batch of wildly variable estimates?</p>
<p>&#8220;number of grains of sand&#8221; was kinda interesting to read about here:  <a href="http://visindavefur.hi.is/svar.asp?id=4803" rel="nofollow">http://visindavefur.hi.is/svar.asp?id=4803</a> estimating the number at<br />
6.63 × 10&#215;22</p>
<p>On the way, I noticed a website calculating the how many grains of sand it would take to fill the universe.  Just checked, the number was with reference to Archimedes.  Bright as he was, I don&#8217;t think he had a clue?</p>
<p>Fusion&#8211;damn you.  Now I have to take some extra minutes to stare at my shit.  Any different shade of red from polyps vs hemorrhoids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misanthropic Scott</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>Misanthropic Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Mr Fusion,

Funny. I&#039;ve never heard the number for either stars or grains of sand. I believe it&#039;s 10^11 galaxies and 10^22 planets. How many stars and grains of sand are there?

It&#039;s also about 10^80 atoms in the observable universe. Any more statistics should be very interesting. However, we&#039;re really looking for the number of turds, microturds and megaturds now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Fusion,</p>
<p>Funny. I&#8217;ve never heard the number for either stars or grains of sand. I believe it&#8217;s 10^11 galaxies and 10^22 planets. How many stars and grains of sand are there?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also about 10^80 atoms in the observable universe. Any more statistics should be very interesting. However, we&#8217;re really looking for the number of turds, microturds and megaturds now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I dunno, but I&#039;d learn to duck real fast and real low.

BTW, (at Bobbo) my wife says dark shit is OK. If your shit is black or had red streaks is when you should worry.

Now, yes, I am making light of this. First, I&#039;m in a good mood, second, I have Pink Floyd&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Shine On You Crazy Diamond (Part One)&lt;/i&gt; soothing my ears, but more important, I just can not grasp the concept of one proton per four cubic meters. Nor can I wrap my brain around how small and insignificant we are in the universe where there are as many stars as there grains of sand on earth.

If I think too hard about this I&#039;m going to want some superior being to take care of the administration end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I dunno, but I&#8217;d learn to duck real fast and real low.</p>
<p>BTW, (at Bobbo) my wife says dark shit is OK. If your shit is black or had red streaks is when you should worry.</p>
<p>Now, yes, I am making light of this. First, I&#8217;m in a good mood, second, I have Pink Floyd&#8217;s <i>Shine On You Crazy Diamond (Part One)</i> soothing my ears, but more important, I just can not grasp the concept of one proton per four cubic meters. Nor can I wrap my brain around how small and insignificant we are in the universe where there are as many stars as there grains of sand on earth.</p>
<p>If I think too hard about this I&#8217;m going to want some superior being to take care of the administration end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misanthropic Scott</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Misanthropic Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>Mr. Fusion,

Funny. And, thanks. So, what happens when the shit hits a whole stadium full of fans? Would that be an attempt at a laboratory reconstruction of the dark matter and energy in the rest of the universe? A whole lotta shit hitting a whole lotta fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Fusion,</p>
<p>Funny. And, thanks. So, what happens when the shit hits a whole stadium full of fans? Would that be an attempt at a laboratory reconstruction of the dark matter and energy in the rest of the universe? A whole lotta shit hitting a whole lotta fans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/a-new-explanation-of-dark-matter/#comment-2365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misanthropicscott.wordpress.com/?p=535#comment-2365</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Well, as you know, I am a big fan of yours. So when this &quot;shit&quot; hits me, it will be hitting the fan.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Well, as you know, I am a big fan of yours. So when this &#8220;shit&#8221; hits me, it will be hitting the fan.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
